PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE OF GAYS DESTROYING THE SANCTITY OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY.
But if gays are allowed to marry, my wife will notice that I don’t try to stay in shape as hard Neil Patrick Harris does!!!
How our world should look like.
WHERE’S FORKS WASHINGTON!!!
I kid…
Um, Kanto, Johto, Hoenn, Sinnoh, and Unova are conspicuously missing here.
After she had her children, Ginny visited Hogwarts, accidentally stumbling upon the Mirror of Erised.
When she looked into it, she found herself holding her children’s birth certificates, and all of their names weren’t shitty
(Source: turnt3chgodh34d, via fishingboatproceeds)
*Requested by anonymous.
It seems pretty clear to me that you belong in Ravenclaw. I mean you got Ravenclaw 2/3 times you took the quiz AND you want to be there. So that’s the hat’s choice and your choice working together. IRL, you would be sorted into Ravenclaw instantly.
My story is just the same, only I was a Hufflepuff in Beta. Now I have a shiny new account decked out in blue and bronze, and I love it. This morning, I made one more account just to make sure, and yep, I got Ravenclaw again no problem.
Think about it this way: the quiz is obviously incredibly variable, right? So that’s inconvenient if it’s Beta and you only get one shot, but now that you can try as many times as you want, it’s a fascinating tool. Now I think of myself as a Ravenclaw who could have succeeded in Hufflepuff. You’re a Ravenclaw who could have succeeded in Slytherin. But you’re definitely a Ravenclaw.
*Requested by anonymous.
Which is exactly what you should have done. I know just how you feel, and I did just what you did (only I had to wait god knows how many months between the Beta opening and a couple days ago). I was in Hufflepuff in Beta and it felt all wrong, like I was living in the wrong skin. Now I’m in Ravenclaw, where I belong. I’ve answered honestly every time.
So now that I’ve scrapped my Beta account for a correctly-sorted (WOO RAVENCLAW) new one and re-collected all the stuff from Philosopher’s Stone….
Yeah, that’s about all I wanted to do.
Wake me up when Chamber of Secrets is unlocked.
So now that I’ve scrapped my Beta account for a correctly-sorted (WOO RAVENCLAW) new one and re-collected all the stuff from Philosopher’s Stone….
Yeah, that’s about all I wanted to do.
Wake me up when Chamber of Secrets is unlocked.
![stayandchewthefat:
scsj:
stayandchewthefat:
lipstick-feminists:
[image description: collection of nine stills with white text; stills show Nymphadora Tonks, Hermione Granger, Minerva McGonagall, Hedwig, Fleur Delacour, Luna Lovegood, Bellatrix Lestrange, and Sybil Trelawney; text reads “Multiple representations of female characters, not just one stereotype, are an accurate way to depict women in fiction.”]
“Multiple representations” that are all white. Whoever made this even included Hedwig before a WOC character like Angelina Johnson. Hmm…
I think you’re forgetting that the UK is about 92% white. It would be inaccurate to include more than a couple non-white characters. Angelina Johnson probably wasn’t included here because she’s not a pivotal character; or at least not nearly as major as any of these nine. Anyway, she and Tonks are really very similar characters, and even though Tonks is white, she’s a Metamorphmagus, and therefore different from her peers in her own way.
Classic. I don’t see what the UK’s demographics have to do with the OP leaving out WOC in the books/films? When you think of “multiple representations,” race should be one of the central factions that come to mind and, though few, there were definitely some WOC in HP. The fact that this person ignored them (even in favor of Hedwig, which is some shit right there!) in their attempt to specifically showcase diverse representations is telling, I think. Any excuse you pull out is not going to alleviate that. Granted, I agree that those representations are minimal, but isn’t that also an issue? If the WOC in HP are so insignificant that someone doesn’t think it’s necessary to include them, doesn’t that itself fuck up the whole idea of “multiple representations”? And yet, that wasn’t even addressed.Also, what does Tonks being a Metamorphmagus have to do with it? Quite a ridiculous, lazy attempt to dismiss the issue.
Sorry, what’s classic, exactly? You seem to have some serious anger issues to sort out.
And by the way, the fact that you’re a dick doesn’t make me not a feminist. Thanks for the sophisticated discourse, asshole.](http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m26sfehZ3s1rrtw1zo1_500.jpg)
scsj:
[image description: collection of nine stills with white text; stills show Nymphadora Tonks, Hermione Granger, Minerva McGonagall, Hedwig, Fleur Delacour, Luna Lovegood, Bellatrix Lestrange, and Sybil Trelawney; text reads “Multiple representations of female characters, not just one stereotype, are an accurate way to depict women in fiction.”]
“Multiple representations” that are all white. Whoever made this even included Hedwig before a WOC character like Angelina Johnson. Hmm…
I think you’re forgetting that the UK is about 92% white. It would be inaccurate to include more than a couple non-white characters. Angelina Johnson probably wasn’t included here because she’s not a pivotal character; or at least not nearly as major as any of these nine. Anyway, she and Tonks are really very similar characters, and even though Tonks is white, she’s a Metamorphmagus, and therefore different from her peers in her own way.
Classic.
I don’t see what the UK’s demographics have to do with the OP leaving out WOC in the books/films? When you think of “multiple representations,” race should be one of the central factions that come to mind and, though few, there were definitely some WOC in HP. The fact that this person ignored them (even in favor of Hedwig, which is some shit right there!) in their attempt to specifically showcase diverse representations is telling, I think. Any excuse you pull out is not going to alleviate that. Granted, I agree that those representations are minimal, but isn’t that also an issue? If the WOC in HP are so insignificant that someone doesn’t think it’s necessary to include them, doesn’t that itself fuck up the whole idea of “multiple representations”? And yet, that wasn’t even addressed.
Also, what does Tonks being a Metamorphmagus have to do with it? Quite a ridiculous, lazy attempt to dismiss the issue.
Sorry, what’s classic, exactly? You seem to have some serious anger issues to sort out.
And by the way, the fact that you’re a dick doesn’t make me not a feminist. Thanks for the sophisticated discourse, asshole.
(Source: feministharrypotter)
